I've had my used Volt less than 2 weeks and my appreciation for it has been climbing quickly;
so much so that if the Gen 2 has more to offer, I might buy a new car for the first time in my life.
That said, here is my list of...
Top 3 things Chevy could do to stymie Volt[ec] progress:
3) Fail to address the driver's field of vision and center stack issues.
2) Make the Volt more like a typical GM/Chevy car.
1) Cheapen the interior to recoup drivetrain costs.
My reasons:
3) The poor rear vision and center stack were the top reasons against buying a Volt during my car shopping/research process. I have to lower my seat as low as it will go in order to see above the spoiler in my rear view mirror; I'm 6' tall, this shouldn't be an issue. Deciphering the center stack buttons distracts the driver; pictographs, colors and tactile surfaces are proven interfaces. The current center stack buttons don't respond when I'm wearing gloves.
2) I've driven as my daily vehicle: Mazda, Toyota, Saturn, Nissan, Ford and a Volt. There isn't a single other GM/Chevy car that I would consider buying. And if I won as a prize a tricked-out top-end Corvette, I would trade it for a Tesla at the same price point ($70K) and not just because of the electrons. The Volt brings new customers to Chevy. If the Volt were more like a typical GM/Chevy, it might not have that draw.
1) One of Gen 2's driving forces is cost reduction. I bought my Volt because I got a car laden with quality-options for $23K (used). I got a 2012 instead of later years because of ALL-leather seat, not just the leather-trimmed seat. The hard plastics on the doors and dash are serious turn-offs; I hope it doesn't get worse. The driver's left arm rest should be a serious driver-comfort concern and not a two-inch, hard plastic ledge for pete's sake!
so much so that if the Gen 2 has more to offer, I might buy a new car for the first time in my life.
That said, here is my list of...
Top 3 things Chevy could do to stymie Volt[ec] progress:
3) Fail to address the driver's field of vision and center stack issues.
2) Make the Volt more like a typical GM/Chevy car.
1) Cheapen the interior to recoup drivetrain costs.
My reasons:
3) The poor rear vision and center stack were the top reasons against buying a Volt during my car shopping/research process. I have to lower my seat as low as it will go in order to see above the spoiler in my rear view mirror; I'm 6' tall, this shouldn't be an issue. Deciphering the center stack buttons distracts the driver; pictographs, colors and tactile surfaces are proven interfaces. The current center stack buttons don't respond when I'm wearing gloves.
2) I've driven as my daily vehicle: Mazda, Toyota, Saturn, Nissan, Ford and a Volt. There isn't a single other GM/Chevy car that I would consider buying. And if I won as a prize a tricked-out top-end Corvette, I would trade it for a Tesla at the same price point ($70K) and not just because of the electrons. The Volt brings new customers to Chevy. If the Volt were more like a typical GM/Chevy, it might not have that draw.
1) One of Gen 2's driving forces is cost reduction. I bought my Volt because I got a car laden with quality-options for $23K (used). I got a 2012 instead of later years because of ALL-leather seat, not just the leather-trimmed seat. The hard plastics on the doors and dash are serious turn-offs; I hope it doesn't get worse. The driver's left arm rest should be a serious driver-comfort concern and not a two-inch, hard plastic ledge for pete's sake!