G
Guest
·Today I looked into the purchase of a used 2017 LT with 850 miles on the clock. It was purchased late December of 2017 and then traded in for an SUV. The car is in brand new condition, only negative is 6 months has been burned off the warranty. I think the option list includes heated seats / steering wheel, backup camera, traction control, and the upgrade to the radio. I'm not familiar with the stock / options and I didn't have time to check so I'm taking them at their word.
The asking price was high given it would no longer qualify for the tax incentives. I priced out comparable new 2018 models and they start at $34K. Subtracting $12.5K worth of incentives brings the price for a new 2018 down to $21.5. Since I'd still have to pay sales tax on that $12.5K I'd have to add back another $1K raising the adjusted price to $22.5K.
When it came time to discuss a price I used the above as the basis for my offer. In the end the dealer agreed to accept $22.5K. Basically a wash financially but from a convenience, i.e. I don't have to wait to get the tax incentive, I felt that was acceptable. I'd eat the 6 month warranty.
My GF and I went to lunch while they prepared the paperwork. I dropped her off at home and returned to the dealer. As I was pulling in we got hit by a hail storm. Unfortunately there was no covered area to park the car. I went in and the salesperson told me finance was ready and we could close the deal. To which I said "not until the hail storm passes and I have an opportunity to inspect the car for damage". He understood and I waited for approximately 30 minutes for the hail storm to pass. After it has passed we inspected the car and all looked OK. However I was uncomfortable buying until there was sun light so I could thoroughly inspect the car. So we agreed to meet tomorrow to look it over and I could sign the paperwork.
That leads me to this very moment where I am sitting at home wondering if $22.5K is decent given it's the same as I would pay for a brand new 2018 model. The negatives to buying the 2017: It's a year older and has 6 months of warranty already used. Negatives to the 2018: I'd have to wait over 6 months to recover the $12.5K and deal with the hassle that typically comes with dealing with the government.
I'd like to hear people's opinion on this. From what I've read in the past most of the responses tend to lean towards the new vehicle.
The asking price was high given it would no longer qualify for the tax incentives. I priced out comparable new 2018 models and they start at $34K. Subtracting $12.5K worth of incentives brings the price for a new 2018 down to $21.5. Since I'd still have to pay sales tax on that $12.5K I'd have to add back another $1K raising the adjusted price to $22.5K.
When it came time to discuss a price I used the above as the basis for my offer. In the end the dealer agreed to accept $22.5K. Basically a wash financially but from a convenience, i.e. I don't have to wait to get the tax incentive, I felt that was acceptable. I'd eat the 6 month warranty.
My GF and I went to lunch while they prepared the paperwork. I dropped her off at home and returned to the dealer. As I was pulling in we got hit by a hail storm. Unfortunately there was no covered area to park the car. I went in and the salesperson told me finance was ready and we could close the deal. To which I said "not until the hail storm passes and I have an opportunity to inspect the car for damage". He understood and I waited for approximately 30 minutes for the hail storm to pass. After it has passed we inspected the car and all looked OK. However I was uncomfortable buying until there was sun light so I could thoroughly inspect the car. So we agreed to meet tomorrow to look it over and I could sign the paperwork.
That leads me to this very moment where I am sitting at home wondering if $22.5K is decent given it's the same as I would pay for a brand new 2018 model. The negatives to buying the 2017: It's a year older and has 6 months of warranty already used. Negatives to the 2018: I'd have to wait over 6 months to recover the $12.5K and deal with the hassle that typically comes with dealing with the government.
I'd like to hear people's opinion on this. From what I've read in the past most of the responses tend to lean towards the new vehicle.