You are not doing any research or paying attention to the details. Lot of discussion and videos on how this is offroad capable (i.e. goes thru 3ft/1m of water, top approach/departure angles, pass-thru for gear, etc, etc. It is a combination of several things.Yes, definitely a city truck, which isn't necessarily a bad thing because that is actually who buys most of the trucks in this country.
Like I said. For play and pissing contests. Not work.You are not doing any research or paying attention to the details. Lot of discussion and videos on how this is offroad capable (i.e. goes thru 3ft/1m of water, top approach/departure angles, pass-thru for gear, etc, etc. It is a combination of several things.
You are making it too complicated. The design is simpler than you think. No need for 2 motors per wheel. What you're missing about electric motor ratings is that they are rated for continuous power, not peak power. They can typically put out much more power than their rating for a short time, but would overheat if they kept it up for long. However the gearboxes are rated for maximum power. So they have a good match at one gearbox per motor.Anyone know how their drivetrain is set up? They say 4 motors, but from the pics it doesn't look like wheel motors. And they talk about a gearbox of some sort. I'm guessing that, for each axle, they have 2 motors going into one gearbox of some sort... I don't know much about fancy gearboxes, but perhaps they have it set up so one motor can drive both wheels (compensate for failed motor) and/or both motors combined into one wheel (provide ton of power to wheel that has traction)? Curious if this would really be better than Tesla's D setup, which seems less complicated.
Other descriptions sound like the gearboxes are separate (4 total)... so a simple reduction gearbox near each wheel, which would be the most obvious way to do this. But that doesn't make sense with other descriptions they have, where they say they can do 300+kW into a gearbox, which is only possible with multiple motors going into one gearbox (motors are 147kW each). Hmmm.
Maybe that "input into gearbox" is just the sum of all 4 independent gearbox inputs. So 300kW means the base version can really only pull 75kW per motor (half their true power) if you want max AWD performance (assume it could do all 300 to rear to max both rear motors for normal traction acceleration). The 562kW version would allow 140kW x 4, which is close to motor's max power, so this might be it, just seems an odd way to spec it.
No, you specifically said "city truck" which implied not capable off the street and I corrected you that it is a lot more than that.Like I said. For play and pissing contests. Not work.
via: https://www.teslarati.com/rivian-r1s-suv-tesla-chief-designer-franz-von-holzhausen/Rivian’s R1S design was led by Jeff Hammound, who joined Rivian in May of 2017 as VP of Vehicle Design. Hammound previously spent 13 years at Fiat Chrysler, where he was Chief of Design for the Jeep division. His most notable design during his tenure with Jeep was the Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition to recruiting Hammound from Jeep, Rivian also brought on Nick Malachowski as Director of Advanced Design.
Yes. "City truck" as in, not a work truck. It's truck that people in the city buy thinking that they might one day take it camping or offroading.No, you specifically said "city truck" which implied not capable off the street and I corrected you that it is a lot more than that.
I can concur with this assessment too.I am already at the point that 250+ is the minimum requirement for an EV because as soon as the weather grows cold or goes to rainy **** range drops and your always leashed to that nearest charger.
Absolutely, one of the major reasons I really like this Rivian company. If they can push other companies to EVs for trucks and SUV/CUVs that is a tremendously large market. The savings ($, pollution, etc) of going from an ICE truck to an EV truck is way better than an ICE car (Prius, etc) to an EV car!Looks promising and I hope they can be successful. Competition is a great motivator!
I'm really happy to see Rivian making use of the shuttered Mitsubishi plant in southern Illinois. Yes, a new truck will be exciting in that segment. I wish them well, we all know how hard it is to enter the auto market, Hard and fantastically expensive. Tesla was reportedly a week or two away from dying during the Model 3 rollout. And many others (Faraday Future, etc.) never got past glitzy announcements and concept cars. So here's wishing them good luck. They will need it.Absolutely, one of the major reasons I really like this Rivian company. If they can put other companies to EVs for trucks and SUV/CUVs that is a tremendously large market. The savings ($, pollution, etc) of going from an ICE truck to an EV truck is way better than an ICE car (Prius, etc) to an EV car!
Hope Toyota, Ford, GM are motivated by Rivian and Teslas entry. Tesla will certainly benefit from Rivian as well since Rivian has taken so many things into account to make this truck versatile. Heck, they even have 'topo' maps when off-roading (forget the term they used in video above).