Tesla stock has been hitting all time highs w/ analysts predicting it will go to $300... what does the stock market know that the LA Times does not?
How to add??Tesla stock has been hitting all time highs w/ analysts predicting it will go to $300... what does the stock market know that the LA Times does not?
If those figures are true, then EV sales are indeed flat and I'm afraid that their stipulation of gasoline prices staying down (relatively) is driving that trend sounds plausible.Sales of electric drive vehicles are stuck at about 3.6% of all new car sales for 2014, Edmunds senior analyst Jessica Caldwell said.
That's below the 3.7% market share for 2013, and it's not likely to grow any before the end of the year.
And that's during an otherwise robust sales season. Total figures for August were higher than any time in the last decade.
With non-GAAP earnings, I'm a billionaire.How to add??
The second gen Volt with a more aggressive sales campaign might bump sales, as would a $29k Volt and the upcoming 200 mile range Bolt.First of all, I'm an EV fan - I want them to do well. I had a Volt and now have an PHEV Fusion Energi.
That being said: The Edumunds.com study they apparently are quoting from (which I can't find - plz post a link if anyone does), simply states:
If those figures are true, then EV sales are indeed flat and I'm afraid that their stipulation of gasoline prices staying down (relatively) is driving that trend sounds plausible.
Now, I don't want gas prices to be higher to drive EV sales, but I sure wish Chevy, Ford, Tesla, etc... were able to drive down battery costs faster than they have been.
Excellent points. I find it amazing that GM is teasing the 2016 Volt as just 1 new car, they need more Voltec models now or they stand to loose more customers (like me). 6 passengers and towing a niches - something bigger than a compact is what a lot in the mainstream want.Which may mean that plug-in sales are canabalizing hybrid sales. It is entirely possible that 3 to 4% is a market saturation point for these cars since they don't have all capabilities in all segments. Iow, there is no way to tow a trailer and haul 6 crew in an EV.
A lot of these vehicles are gen1. I think it's way too early to declare flat sales based on a few years data.
The second gen Volt with a more aggressive sales campaign might bump sales, as would a $29k Volt and the upcoming 200 mile range Bolt.
Would you prefer two 700 HP Dodge Challengers or the one GT-R?
Tesla's got a great future, but there was an interesting discussion from an analyst (who upgraded the stock) a couple of days ago saying that actual projected earnings don't matter at this point. TSLA's got sentiment and momentum. They're closing in on Nissan in terms of market cap.Tesla stock has been hitting all time highs w/ analysts predicting it will go to $300... what does the stock market know that the LA Times does not?
None of those! I would prefer a Tesla Motors Model S. I sat in one and operated the screens, so I know what I really prefer to drive.Would you prefer two 700 HP Dodge Challengers or the one GT-R?
Is it really so amazing that a company, essentially sworn to shareholder return, would not promote less profitable vehicles? I am not saying anything about losing money, here. They learned the hard way that there is such a thing as seeking too much market share, too quickly. They'll probably loose me, too, in favor of "owning" their shareholders. The choice is theirs. You, me and a few others don't necessarily matter in Barra and De Nysschen's world.Excellent points. I find it amazing that GM is teasing the 2016 Volt as just 1 new car, they need more Voltec models now or they stand to loose more customers (like me). 6 passengers and towing a niches - something bigger than a compact is what a lot in the mainstream want.
No worries then as even Tesla has not ever made mention of doing that.... But if Tesla comes out with a 300 mile all electric that can recharge in less than 1/2 hour and that a Middle class family can afford.... I all in. I'm also not holding my breath.
I don't buy into Tesla investors being in support of Tesla's "mission," unless you mean the mission of making money. It's a growth stock and currently subject to a lot of speculation, so that PE ratio isn't so far out of line.It is a tangent on this thread, but the shareholder cultures of Tesla and GM are perhaps more different than the car owners. GM's would never suffer the consequence of a head-long push into electric mobility. Neither would any of the others. How else do you think Stifel could come out with a $400 price target, on TSLA, in a report this week based on earnings of $8 a share? That is paying $400, to earn $8 (in 2017), when history tells us a fair price for a car company earning this type of figure would be around $120 (15 p/e), and that is for earnings next year. This may be greek, to some, but it tells us something about what Tesla investors are willing to tolerate, in support of a different mission. There may be bumps in the road ahead, but I think it is magnificent how much investment philosophy is revisiting "corporate mission".