16:30 Hydrogen Infrastructure
The infrastructure part of the video was quite interesting because of the possibility of generating it locally (vs diesel). Source of diesel, transportation of diesel, who's earning the profit of diesel etc come into play in many peoples mind. Obviously, having hydro or solar panels or wind to help produce it.It still to me seems like expensive science project stuff as they have not worked out the whole production/distribution model (chicken-egg).
whats called “green hydrogen” uses the electrolysis process and require’s a huge amount of power. So siting a green hydrogen production facility alongside large wind or solar power farm. Still a lot of unknown factors including net real cost per mile of movement In hydrogen fueled vehicles.If the hydrogen is made from fossil fuel, I'm not sure about the benefits. If the hydrogen is made from wind/solar splitting water, it's a different story.
For those that watched the video it is not about vehicles that travel 'miles'whats called “green hydrogen” uses the electrolysis process and require’s a huge amount of power. So siting a green hydrogen production facility alongside large wind or solar power farm. Still a lot of unknown factors including net real cost per mile of movement In hydrogen fueled vehicles.
Agreed. One of the key issues with using hydrogen for large-scale heavy transport is storage. It would take huge tanks to store hydrogen at the average interstate truck stop, and it would take a lot of transport to get it there, using more fuel. As a workaround, it's been proposed to transport the hydrogen in the form of ammonia - NH3. There is work on a rapid refining system that could be done on site with low power to separate the hydrogen from the nitrogen in ammonia. If it scales, we may see it as an interim solution.If the hydrogen is made from fossil fuel, I'm not sure about the benefits. If the hydrogen is made from wind/solar splitting water, it's a different story.
Usually the issues around ammonia are involved with how highly a) corrosive and b) toxic it is. Honestly, I'd rather just deal with the hydrogen.Of course, there is the question of where the ammonia comes from? And, why not use ammonia as the fuel instead?
Is Ammonia the Ideal Energy Currency?
The hydrogen molecule is so small, normal leakproof fittings aren't. It's one reason SpaceX avoided using hydrogen as a fuel. Too many potential leak issues.NASA spends $30B on a rocket and it takes them months to chase down all their hydrogen leaks.
An ammonia spill would destroy the entire environment in a several mile radius. This occurred south of Colorado Springs several decades ago and that area is still unsafe to live in.Agreed. One of the key issues with using hydrogen for large-scale heavy transport is storage. It would take huge tanks to store hydrogen at the average interstate truck stop, and it would take a lot of transport to get it there, using more fuel. As a workaround, it's been proposed to transport the hydrogen in the form of ammonia - NH3. There is work on a rapid refining system that could be done on site with low power to separate the hydrogen from the nitrogen in ammonia. If it scales, we may see it as an interim solution.
Of course, there is the question of where the ammonia comes from? And, why not use ammonia as the fuel instead?
Is Ammonia the Ideal Energy Currency?
Yea. A wrinkle in a seal smaller than a hair can cause a dangerous leak. (If I remember correctly, the hydrogen fueling stations for vehicles all leak but have detectors to cut things off if the enviornment gets too explosive.)The hydrogen molecule is so small, normal leakproof fittings aren't. It's one reason SpaceX avoided using hydrogen as a fuel. Too many potential leak issues.