The video gives no information. Where did you find the lap time and who determined a record had been set?Apparently, the Bolt EV just set a production car lap record at Laguna Seca. It runs in a different class than the Tesla Model S, and it ran a 1:56.619 lap time. Not bad.
I believe a Model S does the same thing.Disappointing to see that power gets thermally limited after only 2-3 laps.
That is what happens when you have a much faster and heavier car. You didn't mention the fact that even with the Tesla being thermally limited it is still faster than the bolt at full power.I believe a Model S does the same thing.
ACtually the Model S P85 driver said his car started getting thermally limited after barely half a lap.
And twice the money! Let's get honest, a bone stock Miata would ass-rape either one with a good driver for a lot less money. And I hate Miatas.That is what happens when you have a much faster and heavier car. You didn't mention the fact that even with the Tesla being thermally limited it is still faster than the bolt at full power.
You would hope a car that costs 3 times as much as the Bolt and has superior performance specs across the board would be faster when it's performing at 100%.That is what happens when you have a much faster and heavier car. You didn't mention the fact that even with the Tesla being thermally limited it is still faster than the bolt at full power.I believe a Model S does the same thing.
ACtually the Model S P85 driver said his car started getting thermally limited after barely half a lap.
Uh, what? I've done so many track days in "production" cars that I can't even count them. I've done track days in 100+ degree weather and I've NEVER had to stop or slow down for overheating. I've been to track days out of town where people rented cars to bring to the track, even lowly Corollas, Fiestas, Neons, etc. and had no problem with those overheating either (maybe brakes if you aren't careful and drive like an idiot, actually saw a rented Mustang set fire to its front brakes at Laguna once).Unfortunately that is typical of any production car. They don't have enough cooling or brakes for serious track work. We used to do track days at a local track, the cars were relatively slow (about the speed of my dirt bike) and could only do a few laps before pulling off to cool down.
According to the Model S driver, it was a fast enough pace that he was thermally limited by Turn 6. Regardless, this will be something interesting to try and overcome.Disappointing to see that power gets thermally limited after only 2-3 laps.
I am not sure what cost has to do with it but ok. I mean a D10 dozer is well over $600,000 does that mean it should run a faster lap than a dozer that only costs 100,000? Funny thing is I could probably beat the Million dollar dozer around the track on a $500 scooter. Neither was made for the track but the cheaper one will still beat it.You would hope a car that costs 3 times as much as the Bolt and has superior performance specs across the board would be faster when it's performing at 100%.
The fact it can't even make 1 lap at speed without being limited is pretty hilarious for a brand that is know for performance.
Imagine if BMW had to adjust their motto "The ultimate driving machine*"
* for half a lap
Well, technically, Tesla was dethroned.The tesla does what electric cars do best...accelerate. It is the fastest production car on the planet right now.
Um ok. It isn't a production car it is an aftermarket upgrade to a production car that Dodge is doing. They took the passengers seat out and the rear seat, they stripped it down so it is just barely street legal, they used a different type of method to compare the 0-60 times, they gave it an engine that can run on 100 octane fuel and at best they are going to make a little over 3,000 a year. Then again if you think that is a production car you should look at the links I posted above and see what Tesla stipped down version of a production car can do.
I agree that it is a complete publicity stunt by Dodge, but so is the Tesla P100DL's 0-60 mph time. And it is a limited production car, but it is still a production car in the stripped down trim.Um ok. It isn't a production car it is an aftermarket upgrade to a production car that Dodge is doing. They took the passengers seat out and the rear seat, they stripped it down so it is just barely street legal, they used a different type of method to compare the 0-60 times, they gave it an engine that can run on 100 octane fuel and at best they are going to make a little over 3,000 a year. Then again if you think that is a production car you should look at the links I posted above and see what Tesla stipped down version of a production car can do.
Even the headline says the Dodge Demon "COULD" outrun a Tesla.
Here is an updated version to show that Tesla still reign supreme:
http://insideevs.com/tesla-model-s-p100dl-still-quicker-to-60-than-new-2018-dodge-challenger-srt-demon/
The Tesla has been tested many times by every car magazine out there and just about all of them were able to achieve a 2.28 second 0-60 on a stock P100D. No car magazine has been able to test the Demon and no one has been able to independently verify what it can do.
The quickest FMVSS/NHTSA smog-legal car for new retail sale in the history of cars. Only certain motorcycles are quicker through the traps.Um ok. It (Demon) isn't a production car it is ...
And with all 4 seats in it is still slower than the Tesla that isn't stripped down and running on fuel that is only available at the track.I agree that it is a complete publicity stunt by Dodge, but so is the Tesla P100DL's 0-60 mph time. And it is a limited production car, but it is still a production car in the stripped down trim.