Joined
·
432 Posts
The February issue of Car and Driver magazine has a comparison test between the Volt and the Prius Prime. I don't want to ruin the suspense, so I'll just say one squeaked out a win over the other.
That should get the Prius fanboys all riled up. hahaI read the article. It gives great praise for the Volt, not so much for the Prime. It states that the Volt's rear room is cramped, even with the 5th seat, which is small and perched up with your head under the glass (all true). The Prime's backseat has much more room, but only seats two instead of three. Basically, the Prime is slow and UGLY. The Volt is fast and looks good. They end by saying that the Volt does cost more money, but it is money well spent over the Prime, AND it is the best Plug In Hybrid Built to Date!!
Cue the wailing about "It's not REALLY a hybrid if it plugs in!" (C'mon, we all know it'll be said soon enough....)That should get the Prius fanboys all riled up. haha
Ahhh, but they both plug in, so that is not a valid argument.Cue the wailing about "It's not REALLY a hybrid if it plugs in!" (C'mon, we all know it'll be said soon enough....)
They even said the trunk space difference was small. I have used Edmunds dimensions to calculate trunk volume for the Volt and the Prius and found that GM was very conservative and Toyota was wildly optimistic with their given volumes. I believe, measured the same, the cargo capacity of the Prime is likely very similar to the Volt. Also interesting is that the interior measurements for space front and rear seem very similar...maybe even favoring the Volt. This is at odds with the perception of the testers (as well as others). I know I've put 4 in my Volt a bunch of times now and people rave about the rear seat (although, nobody is particularly tall and I do recognize the headroom isn't great in the Volt).I was having a bit of fun when I said one "squeaked" out a win over the other. Actually the Volt won by a rather large large margin, 209 to 175. The Prius Prime only won in interior space and as tested price. In all areas the Volt won decisively, particularly in the electric only acceleration and looks, where C&D say the Prius ¨looks like something you´d find lurking in the Mariana Trench¨. The Volt was also more fuel efficient in C&D´s 150 mile trip.
I am only 5 feet 9 inches. When I sat in the back of a 2017 with my family when we compared it against the Pacifica, I immediately noticed that my hair brushed the headliner. I found that to be incredibly annoying. Also, when I looked up, I noticed that my head was actually "under" the back glass. I found that to be incredibly disconcerting. When we got home, I did the same test in my 2012 Volt (we were in my wife's Saturn Outlook at the dealerships) and my hair doesn't brush against anything, nor am I perched under the glass. There is obviously more seat room in the 2017, but I believe that extra seat room was gained by pushing the occupant farther back under the glass which gives less headroom.They even said the trunk space difference was small. I have used Edmunds dimensions to calculate trunk volume for the Volt and the Prius and found that GM was very conservative and Toyota was wildly optimistic with their given volumes. I believe, measured the same, the cargo capacity of the Prime is likely very similar to the Volt. Also interesting is that the interior measurements for space front and rear seem very similar...maybe even favoring the Volt. This is at odds with the perception of the testers (as well as others). I know I've put 4 in my Volt a bunch of times now and people rave about the rear seat (although, nobody is particularly tall and I do recognize the headroom isn't great in the Volt).
Height alone is not enough information. What's your inseam?I am only 5 feet 9 inches. When I sat in the back of a 2017 with my family when we compared it against the Pacifica, I immediately noticed that my hair brushed the headliner. I found that to be incredibly annoying. Also, when I looked up, I noticed that my head was actually "under" the back glass. I found that to be incredibly disconcerting. When we got home, I did the same test in my 2012 Volt (we were in my wife's Saturn Outlook at the dealerships) and my hair doesn't brush against anything, nor am I perched under the glass. There is obviously more seat room in the 2017, but I believe that extra seat room was gained by pushing the occupant farther back under the glass which gives less headroom.
And age and location for good measure.Height alone is not enough information. What's your inseam?
Funny, LOL. I have been in a 34 my whole adult life.And age and location for good measure.![]()
Nope, being prior military, I keep it pretty short. I looked it up to verify the numbers and there is indeed less headroom in the rear than my 2012. Hair was NOT touching the glass, but was brushing the headliner. In the back, your head is actually UNDER the glass, which is pretty weird feeling. I kept thinking about having an accident. Wouldn't be a problem for a child or some teens, but most adults, yuck.Yeah, I'm 5'9" and I'm nowhere close to touching the glass. With a 34 inseam (I'm a 30), you must have very tall hair.
2014 ELR rear headroom = 34.7 in. Explains why the 17-yr-old thinks it sux.2017 rear headroom = 35.8
2012 rear headroom = 36.0
I suppose if I lean forward, I get close to the headliner. If I sit normally (head under glass), I have quite a bit room. I'm fairly sure GM has a good justification for the head under glass, but I certainly understand anyone's feeling of unease about it.Nope, being prior military, I keep it pretty short. I looked it up to verify the numbers and there is indeed less headroom in the rear than my 2012. Hair was NOT touching the glass, but was brushing the headliner. In the back, your head is actually UNDER the glass, which is pretty weird feeling. I kept thinking about having an accident. Wouldn't be a problem for a child or some teens, but most adults, yuck.
2017 rear headroom = 35.8
2012 rear headroom = 36.0