Joined
·
296 Posts
I didn't see that anyone had yet posted this:
http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-lutz-qa-20170330-story.html
http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-lutz-qa-20170330-story.html
I somewhat agree, I always thought the X looked more like a minivan than a "SUV" but at least there's some elevated ground clearance unlike most vans..."Model X looks like a loaf of bread."
lulz
While I differ with him on many issues including his politics. He at least gave a sobering account in short phrases of real issues confronting us with one remedy that I agree with. 1. being increasing the federal fuel tax by .25¢. Though he did not elaborate he realizes like many americans the time wasted in traffic both from health and economic standpoint and though he did not give any real answers on that subject, it is not hard to come up with a number of solutions just by asking that question."If he [President Trump] works with the business alliances and the car industry and gets a list that says these are the 10 regulations that have to go, and if he actually gets rid of those, it will create tons of American jobs."
I wish he'd explain how, exactly, getting rid of automotive industry regulations would create jobs. Without detail, this is just blowing smoke. And speaking of smoke, I wish he'd also reveal what the effects on safety and the environment would be.
He's probably more bitter that Tesla now has a market cap greater than Ford's, and that Tesla is slowly catching up to GM.What? He's still bitter that Tesla hasn't gone under? lol.
What is more realistic and is currently being piloted in a few areas is "pay by mile tax"...As minor bonuses, it could help lessen traffic, promote carpooling and people to make errand runs on planned trips...Charge EVs a lesser amount than ICE vehicles...While I differ with him on many issues including his politics. He at least gave a sobering account in short phrases of real issues confronting us with one remedy that I agree with. 1. being increasing the federal fuel tax by .25¢. Though he did not elaborate he realizes like many americans the time wasted in traffic both from health and economic standpoint and though he did not give any real answers on that subject, it is not hard to come up with a number of solutions just by asking that question.
There other sobering thought he put out is how little the market share for EVs is currently and will be in the future. Like many on this forum I'm disappointed on how few EVs are actually sold compared to ICEs. Unfortunately for Lutz and many would be potential EV owners, the question of the time required to recharge seems to be prevalent on the mind of potential buyers. The sad part for those buyers, they do not compare the time wasted going to gas stations, having oil changes or general maintenance at garages. And unfortunately the media has not been helpful on this matter.
Thanks for sharing.
He's probably kicking himself for not acquiring Tesla when they could have paid next to nothing for them in the late 2000s...He's probably more bitter that Tesla now has a market cap greater than Ford's, and that Tesla is slowly catching up to GM.
He was right, but missed the marketing aspect and the dealer challenge aspect. Chevy is simply awful at marketing the Volt and so far the Bolt EV. They don't have a Musk working the social media angle and they don't make up for the deficit with other marketing. And Musk was right about traditional car companies having a hard time selling against their ICE products. Both give Tesla an advantage, as well as using the speed and styling to his advantage. It's always been true that GM could out-engineer and outsell Tesla if they had the will to do so.In this article he states:
"What do you think will happen with Tesla down the line? Bought by a traditional auto company?
Maybe, but who needs it? [Musk] has no technology that’s not available to anybody else. It’s lithium-ion cobalt batteries. Every carmaker on the planet has electric vehicles in the works with a 200-300-mile range."
Yet a year ago he says "'like members of a religious cult'"...Tesla is ADORED (outside this forum, lol), Lutz wishes any of his projects were as adored...
It won't create jobs....it'll only create money for the status quo shills who support the archaic oil and gas industries and the current idiotic auto industries that support them. Lutz is a dinosaur just like the crap that's being pumped out of the ground."If he [President Trump] works with the business alliances and the car industry and gets a list that says these are the 10 regulations that have to go, and if he actually gets rid of those, it will create tons of American jobs."
I wish he'd explain how, exactly, getting rid of automotive industry regulations would create jobs. Without detail, this is just blowing smoke. And speaking of smoke, I wish he'd also reveal what the effects on safety and the environment would be.
All of the above still has issues...Someone greenlighted the Volt at launch under the worst GM brand which by default is the worst dealers...They still launched the Gen2 Volt under Chevy...Now the Bolt, they added the dealership requirement to add DCFC, perfect opportunity to put a Caddy/Buick badge on it which would improve the dealership experience...He was right, but missed the marketing aspect and the dealer challenge aspect. Chevy is simply awful at marketing the Volt and so far the Bolt EV. They don't have a Musk working the social media angle and they don't make up for the deficit with other marketing. And Musk was right about traditional car companies having a hard time selling against their ICE products. Both give Tesla an advantage, as well as using the speed and styling to his advantage. It's always been true that GM could out-engineer and outsell Tesla if they had the will to do so.
Well there is GoPro with stock that went from 80 to 8, and Valeant with a stock price that went from 250 to 10. And those companies actually have earnings, which tend to be a big plus when valuing stock.He's probably more bitter that Tesla now has a market cap greater than Ford's, and that Tesla is slowly catching up to GM.
I'd be interested in learning what ten regulations he thinks would have that kind of impact. Seems crazy. At some point you'd hope that the meme that all that keeps us from unending prosperity is government regulations would die a deserving death. Do people seriously think that places with no government regulation, like Somalia, are good places to do business? It's particularly special coming from a guy who needed the government to bail out his company after it ran itself into the ground.It won't create jobs....it'll only create money for the status quo shills who support the archaic oil and gas industries and the current idiotic auto industries that support them.
The stated purpose of the Volt, from GM's perspective, was to increase mind share for Chevrolet among high paid workers on the coasts. From that perspective the Volt has been a success and the Chevy brand was the right brand to use. (I believe that the Volt is the best selling Chevy in some parts of California, such as San Francisco).All of the above still has issues...Someone greenlighted the Volt at launch under the worst GM brand which by default is the worst dealers
The Volt was the first American car I have bought. And I never cared much for GM. So I am what is called a "conquest sale".The stated purpose of the Volt, from GM's perspective, was to increase mind share for Chevrolet among high paid workers on the coasts. From that perspective the Volt has been a success and the Chevy brand was the right brand to use. (I believe that the Volt is the best selling Chevy in some parts of California, such as San Francisco).
Tesla without Elon Musk would be like Apple has become without Steve Jobs. Musk lacks Lutz's political savvy and Lutz's clout in GM and Musk would soon quit in disgust. Tesla's value lies in Musk's creative spark, not some particular bits of technology.He's probably kicking himself for not acquiring Tesla when they could have paid next to nothing for them in the late 2000s...
In this article he states:
"What do you think will happen with Tesla down the line? Bought by a traditional auto company?
Maybe, but who needs it? [Musk] has no technology that’s not available to anybody else. It’s lithium-ion cobalt batteries. Every carmaker on the planet has electric vehicles in the works with a 200-300-mile range."
Yet a year ago he says "'like members of a religious cult'"...Tesla is ADORED (outside this forum, lol), Lutz wishes any of his projects were as adored...
The bailout of the auto industry wasn't so much for the auto industry as it was to keep the link between the industry itself and the products it consumes to make it work. The tie between the oil and auto industry is undeniable and anyone who claims there is no link is a complete utter dissolutioned fool.I'd be interested in learning what ten regulations he thinks would have that kind of impact. Seems crazy. At some point you'd hope that the meme that all that keeps us from unending prosperity is government regulations would die a deserving death. Do people seriously think that places with no government regulation, like Somalia, are good places to do business? It's particularly special coming from a guy who needed the government to bail out his company after it ran itself into the ground.
This is precisely the attitude that most aholes in power have...including the crooks in companies and the government. This isn't about doing the right thing for people, or the environment, or for future generations or anything at all...it's only...and I mean ONLY about their egos and how to satisfy it and not let them feel left behind.There is a scene in the movie "Revenge of the Electric Car" where Lutz is asked his reasons for developing the Volt and he quips "We're not about to be out-done by some startup in California" (sic).
Same here. Never owned a car of my own and was saving for a Honda or Toyota until I started shopping and learned about the Volt.The Volt was the first American car I have bought. And I never cared much for GM. So I am what is called a "conquest sale".