Is that the truth...Toyotas of the 80s were infamous for having timing belts fail...RECOMMENDED replacement no more than 50,000 miles...Gears fail, chains fail, and belts fail...
Gears or a chain over a belt please. Notice that the change interval for a timing belt is sooner than for a timing chain. BOTH eventually need to get changed.
I wouldn't compare an on road only, lightweight (comparably), non-tow rated, FWD car to a 4WD truck that is going off road or being operated in 4WD.
Belt replacement on my old Porsche is every 30k miles, plus replacing all the rollers and whatnot every 60k miles. Interference engine too, so if it snaps, goodbye valves.Is that the truth...Toyotas of the 80s were infamous for having timing belts fail...RECOMMENDED replacement no more than 50,000 miles...[/url]
Sounds more like what I recall (sitting at my desk).another correction, i don't remember exactly, i don't think is says off, i think it says 2wd, 4-hi, 4-low and auto. shows you how much we drive it...... lmao
Dang, I really wanted one of those old boats, just 'cuz.Anybody that don't believe that needs to drive a 1976 eldorado and see how much it jerks back and forth from the slack when you let off the gas and give it gas again.....
Indeed, the 3.8L V6 and 4T60 were bullet proof, GM nailed that combo. few small issues come to mind... ignition coils and some camshaft bearings walked out causing low oil pressure... I had a supercharged grandprix GTP with that setup, sold it at 120K miles, not a single issue... I loved that car. Heads up display, full comfort seat and fast enough...My present 21 year old Buick Regal (in my signature) still has the original 3.8 L V6 engine and the 4T60-E transmission with no failures or repairs. .
Chain = Weight reduction and allows for better fitment in tight areas, you can route a chain around funky curves within the case - with rollers or guides - slim down the case size and shape. For front wheel drive cars often it is a necessity.It's interesting that Prius went from chain (Gen. 2) to gear (Gen. 3) while Volt went from gear (Gen. 1) to chain (Gen. 2). Personally, I'll take gear over chain any day!
Gen 1 uses gears. Toyota has switched from chain to gears. GM has done the reverse. While they have used chains in the past there was a class action lawsuit on the Vue CVT (chain?)which has me concerned as well.What does the Gen 1 use if not chains?
Gen 1 uses gears. Toyota has switched from chain to gears. GM has done the reverse. While they have used chains in the past there was a class action lawsuit on the Vue CVT (chain?)which has me concerned as well.
Fine. Manufacturers have been using chains for probably longer than you've been alive in drive units.
The metal belts used on a traditional CVT are a completely different animal from a final drive chain. The drive chain has teeth that mesh with toothed gears on both ends, while the CVT belt is pinched between the sides of the pulley and has to transfer the torque through shear at the edges.Gen 1 uses gears. Toyota has switched from chain to gears. GM has done the reverse. While they have used chains in the past there was a class action lawsuit on the Vue CVT (chain?)which has me concerned as well.
Actually, now that this thread has awakened, I'll contradict my statement above and say I do see one difference. With gears, you have 2 or maybe 3 gear teeth bearing all the load. With a chain, the torque is distributed to roughly half the teeth on the gear. At least conceptually, I would think a chain would be better for that reason.Gear. Chain. They're both metal on metal. I don't see a difference at least conceptually.
Mike